In traditional pencil and paper training format, you might calculate
That would be enough to cover the basics of conflict styles in 80-120 minutes. You could easily do a lot more, of course, if you have another hour or several more. See my Trainers Guide, available as a free download, for ideas.
Online tools open another scenario that many trainers like because it pushes individual activities outside of workshop time and allows the trainer to dedicate more classroom time to discussion.
Using the online version could look something like this:
In these groups, they each share what they see as one of their best strengths in the use of this style, and also each tells a short story of a time when they see that they over-used this style and it created difficulty. Hopefully you'll have more than an hour, in which case you can get lots of ideas for valuable discussion in the Trainers Guide.
Using this approach, it's possible to do a compact but coherent conflict styles workshop in as short as an hour. A length of 90-120 minutes would be better, but if an hour is all you can give, you can still create a worthwhile learning experience.
When using the online version, the Style Matters dashboard or coupon access allow you to send out invitations without big demands on your time to users.
For years I felt that users got a roughly equivalent product in the print and online versions. But more recently my assessment has changed. In early 2017 we substantially upgraded the algorithm for generating online score reports. It looks for a variety of patterns in the numbers and generates a detailed score report accordingly. This score report contains many suggestions for self-management based on scores, including situations where user scores are quite close among several styles.
An experienced trainer able to study an individual score report for several minutes can probably get close to that level of analysis. But in group settings, that's hardly possible. Even if the trainer is able to quickly identify the patterns, it takes several minutes of talking per user to describe those patterns. The limits of time make it impossible to provide that with more than a couple of people.
So, much as I love the human connection of the old-fashioned pencil-and-paper format, users get more specific, targeted feedback if they use the online version.
The ideal is a combo approach: Users take the inventory on their own online and bring a printed out score report to class. The trainer then works with them in reflecting on their score report and comparing notes with others.